2 edition of Scheduling two-phase jobs with arbitrary time lags in a single-server system found in the catalog.
Scheduling two-phase jobs with arbitrary time lags in a single-server system
Lin Ka Yuk Carrie.
Thesis (Ph.D) - University of Birmingham, School of Manufacturing and Mechanical Engineering, 1995.
|Statement||by Carrie Lin Ka Yuk.|
Real time scheduling algorithms: In a system of set of processes, determining which process should be executed next in addition to satisfying the time constrains are the main problem for the scheduler. Real time system must respond to the event as quickly as possible, when an event is occurred. Start studying Operating Systems - Scheduling. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. Search. Shortest Job First time for schedule to take current process off CPU and switch to another. Soft real-time systems.
a specific type of project schedule compression technique performed by taking action to decrease the total project schedule duration after analyzing a number of alternatives to determine how to get the maximum schedule duration compression for the least additional cost. typical approaches for crashing a schedule include reducing schedule activity durations and increasing the assignment of. Batch-like scheduling makes sense when the time scale for the value of the result is relatively large. Such can lead to greater system resource utilization. Amazon's AWS spot instances is practical example of the mutual benefit of job scheduling (cheap compute for the user, income from otherwise unused resources for the compute provider).
way to schedule the project in less than 11 hrs. The longest path from start to end in this graph. is 11 hrs. This is called our critical path. Notation: X(6) = processing time of 6 -- it takes 6 hours to complete task A. X  = critical time of 8, -- it takes 8 hours to reach. Scheduling study guide by Jennifer includes 27 questions covering vocabulary, terms and more. Quizlet flashcards, activities and games help you improve your grades.
Henry VIII and Tudor Living Box 33.
Ideology and Politics
Great sermons on Christ
Woman most wild
From neurons to neighborhoods
Defence, disarmament, peace
Ten steps to hope.
Should you lease or buy equipment?
BMF year book.
Macroeconomic analysis of transformation in the CSFR
The Secret of The Magical Baby Giggle Wigglettes
This study presents a scheduling problem where each job has two service phases, separated by an arbitrary time lag. The objective is to minimize the maximum completion time of all jobs in a single-server system. The job-processing order of each service phase is allowed to be by: 5.
Scheduling coupled-operation jobs with exact time-lags on a single machine has a wide range of applications. In that problem, each job consists of two operations with given processing times, which Cited by: 9. Scheduling coupled-operation jobs with exact time-lags on a single machine has a wide range of applications.
Scheduling coupled-operation jobs with exact time-lags on a single machine has a wide range of applications. In that problem, each job consists of two operations with given processing times, which should be scheduled on a single machine observing a given by: 9. Three scheduling problems of jobs with arbitrary time lags in a single-server system are considered.
The optimization criteria used are maximum completion time and mean completion time. Two adaptive versions of both techniques: the adaptive neighbourhood search and the adaptive temperature/threshold values are proposed which guide the future search according to the recent Cited by: A time lag specifies a minimum time delay required between the execution of two consecutive operations of the same job.
Time lags may be the result of transportation delays (like the time required Author: Xiandong Zhang. by one at the very beginning time of the system. Whenever the request of an order is made, the scheduler has to assign a machine and a processing slot for it irrevocably without knowledge of any information of future job or-ders.
In this on-line situation, the jobs’ release times are assumed to be arbitrary. The scheduling problem under study has the following characteristics: arbitrary job sizes, arbitrary job processing times, and non-identical machine capacities.
This paper considers the problem of on-line scheduling a list of independent jobs in which each job has an arbitrary release time and length in [1,r] with r≥1 on m parallel identical machines. For the list scheduling algorithm, we give an upper bound of the competitive ratio for any m≥1 and show that the upper bound is tight when m=1.
When m=2, we present a tight bound for r≥ by: Solving Single Machine Scheduling Problem With Common Due Date Nordin Haji Mohamad1 and Fatimah Said2 Abstract The paper addresses an n-job single machine scheduling problem with common due date to minimize the sum of total inventory and penalty costs.
Earliness and and negative time-lags between jobs, solvable by a branch and bound. Three scheduling problems of jobs with arbitrary time lags in a single-server system are considered. The optimization criteria used are maximum completion time. This paper addresses a preemptive scheduling problem on two parallel machines with a single server.
Each job has to be loaded (setup) by the server before being processed on the machines. Approximation algorithms for scheduling jobs with release times and arbitrary sizes on batch machines with non-identical capacities. Author links open overlay panel Shuguang Li a b.
they posed an interesting problem of designing algorithms for the general problem where jobs have arbitrary processing times (release time has not been mentioned).Cited by: 3.
Lags are strictly for a fixed period of time that takes no resources and will not change. It’s the unchanging nature of lag that can make it problematic in scheduling.
Lag works well to model wait time for processes, such as the curing of concrete or the drying of paint. Yes, lag has it place in the echelon of scheduling tools.
Consider the schedule under which job 2 is processed on machine 2 before job 1. This implies that job 2 starts its processing on machine 2 at time 2 and job 1 starts its processing on machine 2 at time 4.
This schedule is semi-active. However, it is not active as job 1 can be processed on machine 2 without delaying the processing of job 2 onFile Size: KB.
Common Approaches to Real-Time Scheduling •Clock-driven (time-driven) schedulers In a system one processor and with preemptions allowed, EDF can produce a feasible schedule of a job set J with arbitrary release times and deadlines iff such a schedule exists.
•Proof: by schedule transformation. • Hence, no job is transferred twice, and after at most Jiterations, the algorithm must terminate Theorem The local search procedure for scheduling jobs on identical parallel machines is a 2-approximation algorithm.
MAT ApprAl, Spring 9-Apr File Size: KB. Lin Ka Yuk has written: 'Scheduling two-phase jobs with arbitrary time lags in a single-server system' Asked in Authors, Poets, and Playwrights What has the author Sio-Lin Kwik written.
Scheduling of real-time tasks is very different from general scheduling. Ordinary scheduling algorithms attempt to ensure fairness among tasks, minimum progress for any individual task, and prevention of starvation and deadlock.
To the scheduler of real-time tasks, these goals are often superficial. The primary concern in scheduling real-time File Size: KB. SJF is optimal in terms of average waiting time for a given set of processes,i.e., average waiting time is minimum with this scheduling, but problems are, how to know/predict the time of next job.
Exercise: Consider a system which requires time units of burst time/5. Discrete Applied Mathematics 18 () North-Holland SCHEDULING JOBS WITH FIXED START AND END TIMES Esther M. ARKIN and Ellen B. SILVERBERG Department of Operations Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CAUSA Received 7 August Revised 28 July We analyze a scheduling problem in which each job has a fixed start and end time and a by: Abstract.
In this chapter, we consider agent scheduling problems in which job processing times are means that the processing times, contrary to other chapters of the book, are not fixed and may change depending on such parameters as job starting times, job positions in schedule or the amount of resources allocated to jobs.
Though problems of this type appear in Author: Alessandro Agnetis, Jean-Charles Billaut, Stanisław Gawiejnowicz, Dario Pacciarelli, Ameur Soukhal.Fair share uses shares of CPU time rather than priorities to schedule jobs.
A certain share of the available CPU time is allocated to a project, which is a set of processes. System class is reserved for kernel use. (User programs running in kernel mode are NOT considered in the system scheduling class.) Example: Windows XP Scheduling.